Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)


 

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Andy Neil
06/19/09 06:16
Read: 110 times
Basingstoke
Uk


 		 #166248 - You missed the point!
Responding to: Sandeep Gupta's previous message
If you only have a few large variables that need to be banked, then you don't need to use Keil's banking at all - just do it "manually"

I have successfully used this approach before - where all the "normal" variables are managed by the compiler as non-banked, and there was just a "manual" bank-switch to access a 32K "bank" for data logging...

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Code and XDatabanking      Sandeep Gupta      06/16/09 02:55      
   Manually handle a few large variables?      Per Westermark      06/16/09 03:39      
      Code and XDatabanking      Sandeep Gupta      06/19/09 01:54      
         You missed the point!      Andy Neil      06/19/09 06:16      
   Do you *have* to use an 8051?      Andy Neil      06/19/09 02:07      
      Code and XDatabanking      Sandeep Gupta      06/19/09 05:35      
         Fair enough, then!      Andy Neil      06/19/09 06:10      
         no banking      Erik Malund      06/19/09 08:33      
            Cross reference      Andy Neil      06/19/09 08:49      
               Verbiage      Erik Malund      06/19/09 09:48      
   P3_3 commonly for ROM and RAM to switch banks?      Frieder Ferlemann      06/19/09 14:09      
      that will not work      Erik Malund      06/19/09 14:44      
         Interference      Per Westermark      06/19/09 15:05      

Back to Subject List