| Jez Smith 06/20/09 00:18 Modified: 06/20/09 00:40 Read: 218 times Cambridge(again) England Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#166273 - Richard misses the point completely Responding to: David Prentice's previous message |
As does anyone who writes entirely in assembler.
A high level language allows the designer to think like a designer, design the system from the top down and removes from the design process any need to worry about trivial details such as which variable are on the stack and so on. I don't know anyone who does any serious embedded systems design who even cares what variable are on the stack or any details like that because the compiler handles the messy details. Obviously you need to know how the processor you are working with works and you need to know the details of the hardware its connected to. I work in an office where if my boss for example found out that i had spent half a day worrying about some trivail detail which could be handled automaticaly by the compiler I would be out on my ear. Where I work they are quite happy for you to spend 6 months developing an algorithm and they will leave you alone to do that but if they find you are taking the piss by hand coding some bubble sort routine then thats it you are finished. In the real world its getting working systems out the door and making money that matters not buggering about writing everything in non-portable spaghetti code which only one person understands and only one person can work on. Only this week i had to look at some HDL code someone had written 6 years ago and it was a case of looking at the code, seeing what it was meant to do and going 'oh I see where the problem is, fixing it and copying the fixed code into the source tree and Bob's your uncle jobs done. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What's wrong with gimme code? | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/15/09 23:24 |
| Mainly | Jez Smith | 06/16/09 00:33 |
| I agree with Jez Smith | Kiran V. Sutar | 06/16/09 01:49 |
| Non academic gimme code? | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/16/09 02:41 |
| This makes me very suspicious | Jez Smith | 06/16/09 02:52 |
| gimme code=my own time is too valuable | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 03:34 |
| Easy to see which is school assignment | David Prentice | 06/16/09 03:54 |
| The wise student needs pointers, not complete solutions | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 04:24 |
| "Here's what I've come up with ... | Christoph Franck | 06/16/09 04:56 |
| But what's wrong in asking for an example implementaton? | Jan Waclawek | 06/16/09 05:12 |
| The teacher recognises the good student | David Prentice | 06/16/09 05:33 |
| Now there's a laugh if ever there was one ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:35 |
| nothing IF ... | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 08:50 |
| children should do their own homework | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:32 |
| What's wrong with gimmee code. | Joseph Hebert | 06/16/09 00:44 |
| Sounds Like; Whats wrong with Spoon Feeding..? | Mahesh Joshi | 06/16/09 06:05 |
| perhaps it enables ... | David Prentice | 06/16/09 06:28 |
| Generic solutions applicable to more people | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 07:28 |
| Then they'll become expert at potty ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:37 |
| it makes you dumb! | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 08:42 |
| How'd you like ten of those guys working for you? | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:39 |
| But that's the point! | Kai Klaas | 06/17/09 08:39 |
| We agree in principle, Kai ... but ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:16 |
| Hiring & firing is expensive! | Andy Neil | 06/18/09 01:42 |
| and that's not all! | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 07:41 |
| As an example | Jez Smith | 06/16/09 15:17 |
| No-one is suggesting breach of copyright | David Prentice | 06/16/09 15:37 |
| arrogance? | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 15:48 |
| Examples of Erik's arrogance | Hans Heinz | 06/17/09 08:52 |
| no, I do not state any such, | Erik Malund | 06/17/09 09:15 |
| A couple of corrections | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:29 |
| more useful product? | Erik Malund | 06/17/09 12:30 |
| life is not B&W | Jan Waclawek | 06/16/09 15:53 |
| Good help _is_ to a big part to give hints | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 16:47 |
| Votes and freedom of speech? | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 16:57 |
| When I was a youngster ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 02:01 |
| Returning to the original subject. | David Prentice | 06/17/09 02:24 |
| same same but sometimes different | Per Westermark | 06/17/09 02:57 |
| Since you like AVRFREAKS so much ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:43 |
| Versatility and diversification | Per Westermark | 06/17/09 02:52 |
| This is 8052.COM | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:35 |
| and..... | Jez Smith | 06/17/09 05:05 |
| There's always help for those who can do their own work. | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 01:40 |
| There's the key! | Andy Neil | 06/17/09 01:54 |
| that is not the issue | Erik Malund | 06/17/09 09:18 |
| I'm with you 100% on that, Erik | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:46 |
| calm down Richard | Jez Smith | 06/17/09 11:23 |
| support for more MCU's makes it more widely useful | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 16:26 |
| it? | Erik Malund | 06/18/09 08:44 |
| Which MCU's will KEIL support? | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 13:22 |
| Irrelevant | Per Westermark | 06/18/09 16:34 |
| Keil's blind spot | Andy Neil | 06/18/09 17:33 |
| Keil will probably get squeezed | Per Westermark | 06/18/09 17:50 |
| If only that were the case | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 22:49 |
| Portable 'C' [edited] | Andy Neil | 06/19/09 01:56 |
| Write what you mean or mean what you write | Per Westermark | 06/19/09 03:33 |
| OK ... Here's the point | Richard Erlacher | 06/19/09 16:13 |
| If bugs is a big problem - consider your compiler choices | Per Westermark | 06/19/09 17:37 |
| C is not that difficult | David Prentice | 06/19/09 04:20 |
| I can't totally disagree ... it's a matter of degree | Richard Erlacher | 06/19/09 19:27 |
| Richard misses the point completely | Jez Smith | 06/20/09 00:18 |
| The thing is... | Andy Neil | 06/17/09 17:08 |
| I don't think thats true at all | Jez Smith | 06/18/09 04:13 |
| Not what I meant | Andy Neil | 06/18/09 05:15 |
| Andy's right! | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 08:11 |
| elders and betters would have given a helpful reply. | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 19:15 |
| If you think 8052.com is bad ... | Andy Peters | 06/17/09 13:14 |
| When was it the last time someone asked for code? | Jan Waclawek | 06/17/09 15:56 |
| oohhh | Jez Smith | 06/17/09 16:04 |
| Here? | Andy Neil | 06/17/09 16:23 |
| Latest example of "Gimme Code" | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 19:01 |
| What the forums are all about | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/26/09 07:39 |
| Progress | Steve M. Taylor | 06/26/09 10:41 |
| No, don't agree with "exhausted all the possibilities" | Per Westermark | 06/26/09 11:22 |
| patience | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/27/09 08:28 |
| inexperienced | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/27/09 08:16 |
| Well actually... | Steve M. Taylor | 06/27/09 09:44 |
| you must have a very smart wife | Erik Malund | 06/27/09 09:59 |
| If you're a friend ;-) | Steve M. Taylor | 06/28/09 04:30 |
| arrogant? | Erik Malund | 06/26/09 13:44 |
| encouragement | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/27/09 08:34 |
| absolutely | Erik Malund | 06/27/09 09:05 |
| What you have to remember | Jez Smith | 06/27/09 22:30 |
| Tim Berners-Lee | Steve M. Taylor | 06/28/09 04:33 |
| he only invented the web thingy | Jez Smith | 06/28/09 10:49 |
| Exhausted all the possibilities... | Per Westermark | 06/28/09 13:25 |
| this is just not fair | Jan Waclawek | 06/28/09 13:47 |
| It's about attitude | Per Westermark | 06/28/09 15:22 |
| on intentions etc. | Jan Waclawek | 06/28/09 16:27 |
| 98% of 100 | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 19:23 |
| good and bad | Erik Malund | 06/28/09 15:24 |
| OK Charles (et al), here's your chance! | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 18:58 |
| re: OK Charles here's your chance | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 07/02/09 07:44 |
| QED. | Andy Neil | 07/02/09 08:58 |
Yet one more exhausted visitor | Per Westermark | 07/03/09 02:40 |



